{"total":16,"rows":[{"id":"2305.18703","title":"Domain Specialization as the Key to Make Large Language Models Disruptive: A Comprehensive Survey","created":"2023-05-30","cited_by_count":135,"area":null},{"id":"2402.01864","title":"(A)I Am Not a Lawyer, But...: Engaging Legal Experts towards Responsible LLM Policies for Legal Advice","created":"2024-02-02","cited_by_count":63,"area":null},{"id":"2212.02199","title":"Legal Prompt Engineering for Multilingual Legal Judgement Prediction","created":"2022-12-05","cited_by_count":55,"area":null},{"id":"2406.14805","title":"How Well Do LLMs Represent Values Across Cultures? Empirical Analysis of LLM Responses Based on Hofstede Cultural Dimensions","created":"2024-06-21","cited_by_count":52,"area":null},{"id":"2310.11878","title":"From Dissonance to Insights: Dissecting Disagreements in Rationale Construction for Case Outcome Classification","created":"2023-10-18","cited_by_count":14,"area":null},{"id":"2302.00768","title":"Leveraging Task Dependency and Contrastive Learning for Case Outcome Classification on European Court of Human Rights Cases","created":"2023-02-01","cited_by_count":12,"area":null},{"id":"2405.14211","title":"ChronosLex: Time-aware Incremental Training for Temporal Generalization of Legal Classification Tasks","created":"2024-05-23","cited_by_count":11,"area":null},{"id":"2312.00480","title":"Japanese Tort-case Dataset for Rationale-supported Legal Judgment Prediction","created":"2023-12-01","cited_by_count":5,"area":null},{"id":"2403.16852","title":"Towards Explainability in Legal Outcome Prediction Models","created":"2024-03-25","cited_by_count":4,"area":null},{"id":"2409.18644","title":"Incorporating Precedents for Legal Judgement Prediction on European Court of Human Rights Cases","created":"2024-09-27","cited_by_count":4,"area":null},{"id":"2503.00128","title":"AnnoCaseLaw: A Richly-Annotated Dataset For Benchmarking Explainable Legal Judgment Prediction","created":"2025-02-28","cited_by_count":3,"area":null},{"id":"2404.01961","title":"Team UTSA-NLP at SemEval 2024 Task 5: Prompt Ensembling for Argument Reasoning in Civil Procedures with GPT4","created":"2024-04-02","cited_by_count":2,"area":null},{"id":"2409.18645","title":"The Craft of Selective Prediction: Towards Reliable Case Outcome Classification -- An Empirical Study on European Court of Human Rights Cases","created":"2024-09-27","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2312.00584","title":"The Ethics of Automating Legal Actors","created":"2023-12-01","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2404.10481","title":"BayesJudge: Bayesian Kernel Language Modelling with Confidence Uncertainty in Legal Judgment Prediction","created":"2024-04-16","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2406.10974","title":"Towards Supporting Legal Argumentation with NLP: Is More Data Really All You Need?","created":"2024-06-16","cited_by_count":0,"area":null}],"next_cursor":null}