{"total":32,"rows":[{"id":"2306.00622","title":"ReviewerGPT? An Exploratory Study on Using Large Language Models for Paper Reviewing","created":"2023-06-01","cited_by_count":122,"area":null},{"id":"2412.11948","title":"OpenReviewer: A Specialized Large Language Model for Generating Critical Scientific Paper Reviews","created":"2024-12-16","cited_by_count":65,"area":null},{"id":"2211.06651","title":"NLPeer: A Unified Resource for the Computational Study of Peer Review","created":"2022-11-12","cited_by_count":60,"area":null},{"id":"2306.12587","title":"ARIES: A Corpus of Scientific Paper Edits Made in Response to Peer Reviews","created":"2023-06-21","cited_by_count":34,"area":null},{"id":"2405.20477","title":"Automated Focused Feedback Generation for Scientific Writing Assistance","created":"2024-05-30","cited_by_count":33,"area":null},{"id":"2405.06563","title":"What Can Natural Language Processing Do for Peer Review?","created":"2024-05-10","cited_by_count":25,"area":null},{"id":"2502.13668","title":"PeerQA: A Scientific Question Answering Dataset from Peer Reviews","created":"2025-02-19","cited_by_count":22,"area":null},{"id":"2403.00241","title":"CASIMIR: A Corpus of Scientific Articles enhanced with Multiple Author-Integrated Revisions","created":"2024-03-01","cited_by_count":14,"area":null},{"id":"2503.21717","title":"CLAIMCHECK: How Grounded are LLM Critiques of Scientific Papers?","created":"2025-03-27","cited_by_count":12,"area":null},{"id":"2406.00197","title":"Re3: A Holistic Framework and Dataset for Modeling Collaborative Document Revision","created":"2024-05-31","cited_by_count":11,"area":null},{"id":"2407.07799","title":"Attribute or Abstain: Large Language Models as Long Document Assistants","created":"2024-07-10","cited_by_count":11,"area":null},{"id":"2410.02028","title":"Are Large Language Models Good Classifiers? A Study on Edit Intent Classification in Scientific Document Revisions","created":"2024-10-02","cited_by_count":11,"area":null},{"id":"2502.02904","title":"ScholaWrite: A Dataset of End-to-End Scholarly Writing Process","created":"2025-02-05","cited_by_count":9,"area":null},{"id":"2402.12431","title":"Understanding Fine-grained Distortions in Reports of Scientific Findings","created":"2024-02-19","cited_by_count":8,"area":null},{"id":"2302.12611","title":"CARE: Collaborative AI-Assisted Reading Environment","created":"2023-02-24","cited_by_count":7,"area":null},{"id":"2604.11543","title":"NovBench: Evaluating Large Language Models on Academic Paper Novelty Assessment","created":"2026-04-13","cited_by_count":7,"area":null},{"id":"2401.17658","title":"Document Structure in Long Document Transformers","created":"2024-01-31","cited_by_count":6,"area":null},{"id":"2502.11193","title":"Large Language Models Penetration in Scholarly Writing and Peer Review","created":"2025-02-16","cited_by_count":6,"area":null},{"id":"2409.01882","title":"Investigating Expert-in-the-Loop LLM Discourse Patterns for Ancient Intertextual Analysis","created":"2024-09-03","cited_by_count":4,"area":null},{"id":"2505.22076","title":"ArgInstruct: Specialized Instruction Fine-Tuning for Computational Argumentation","created":"2025-05-28","cited_by_count":4,"area":null},{"id":"2602.11173","title":"Author-in-the-Loop Response Generation and Evaluation: Integrating Author Expertise and Intent in Responses to Peer Review","created":"2026-01-19","cited_by_count":4,"area":null},{"id":"2601.07533","title":"Loci Similes: A Benchmark for Extracting Intertextualities in Latin Literature","created":"2026-01-12","cited_by_count":3,"area":null},{"id":"2606.04906","title":"'Your AI Text is not Mine': Redefining and Evaluating AI-generated Text Detection under Realistic Assumptions","created":"2026-06-03","cited_by_count":3,"area":null},{"id":"2301.03774","title":"How Data Scientists Review the Scholarly Literature","created":"2023-01-10","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2603.00003","title":"Commitment Checklist: Auditing Author Commitments in Peer Review","created":"2026-01-08","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2603.28515","title":"EarlySciRev: A Dataset of Early-Stage Scientific Revisions Extracted from LaTeX Writing Traces","created":"2026-03-30","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2211.05604","title":"An Inclusive Notion of Text","created":"2022-11-10","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2511.22036","title":"ResearchArcade: Graph Interface for Academic Tasks","created":"2025-11-27","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2601.15172","title":"Is Peer Review Really in Decline? Analyzing Review Quality across Venues and Time","created":"2026-01-21","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2602.10118","title":"Reviewing the Reviewer: LLM-Assisted Reviewer Feedback Generation for Guideline Compliance","created":"2026-01-17","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2607.14117","title":"Heterogeneous Element-Aware Cross-Version Differencing of Scientific Documents via Layout-Aware Alignment and Structure-Aware Reasoning","created":"2026-05-08","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2609.11460","title":"ReGround: Grounding Reviewer Comments in Multimodal Evidence","created":"2026-09-10","cited_by_count":0,"area":null}],"next_cursor":null}