{"total":18,"rows":[{"id":"2405.06563","title":"What Can Natural Language Processing Do for Peer Review?","created":"2024-05-10","cited_by_count":25,"area":null},{"id":"2507.23276","title":"How Far Are AI Scientists from Changing the World?","created":"2025-07-31","cited_by_count":15,"area":null},{"id":"2303.16750","title":"A Gold Standard Dataset for the Reviewer Assignment Problem","created":"2023-03-23","cited_by_count":11,"area":null},{"id":"2207.02303","title":"A Dataset on Malicious Paper Bidding in Peer Review","created":"2022-06-24","cited_by_count":9,"area":null},{"id":"2502.00690","title":"Dissecting Submission Limit in Desk-Rejections: A Mathematical Analysis of Fairness in AI Conference Policies","created":"2025-02-02","cited_by_count":9,"area":null},{"id":"2303.14443","title":"No more Reviewer #2: Subverting Automatic Paper-Reviewer Assignment using Adversarial Learning","created":"2023-03-25","cited_by_count":7,"area":null},{"id":"2402.07860","title":"On the Detection of Reviewer-Author Collusion Rings From Paper Bidding","created":"2024-02-12","cited_by_count":7,"area":null},{"id":"2412.06606","title":"Vulnerability of Text-Matching in ML/AI Conference Reviewer Assignments to Collusions","created":"2024-12-09","cited_by_count":7,"area":null},{"id":"2304.11160","title":"Isotonic Mechanism for Exponential Family Estimation in Machine Learning Peer Review","created":"2023-04-21","cited_by_count":6,"area":null},{"id":"2207.11315","title":"Tradeoffs in Preventing Manipulation in Paper Bidding for Reviewer Assignment","created":"2022-07-22","cited_by_count":4,"area":null},{"id":"2601.19637","title":"RATE: Reviewer Profiling and Annotation-free Training for Expertise Ranking in Peer Review Systems","created":"2026-01-27","cited_by_count":2,"area":null},{"id":"2604.23593","title":"When AI reviews science: Can we trust the referee?","created":"2026-04-26","cited_by_count":2,"area":null},{"id":"2411.02654","title":"Fair and Welfare-Efficient Constrained Multi-matchings under Uncertainty","created":"2024-11-04","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2411.11437","title":"Causal Effect of Group Diversity on Redundancy and Coverage in Peer-Reviewing","created":"2024-11-18","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2506.20141","title":"Accept More, Reject Less: Reducing up to 19% Unnecessary Desk-Rejections over 11 Years of ICLR Data","created":"2025-06-25","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2601.15249","title":"Recommending Best Paper Awards for ML/AI Conferences via the Isotonic Mechanism","created":"2026-01-21","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2512.17950","title":"Which Coauthor Should I Nominate in My 99 ICLR Submissions? A Mathematical Analysis of the ICLR 2026 Reciprocal Reviewer Nomination Policy","created":"2025-12-17","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2602.06078","title":"Allocate Marginal Reviews to Borderline Papers Using LLM Comparative Ranking","created":"2026-02-04","cited_by_count":0,"area":null}],"next_cursor":null}