{"total":32,"rows":[{"id":"2306.00622","title":"ReviewerGPT? An Exploratory Study on Using Large Language Models for Paper Reviewing","created":"2023-06-01","cited_by_count":122,"area":null},{"id":"2406.16253","title":"LLMs Assist NLP Researchers: Critique Paper (Meta-)Reviewing","created":"2024-06-24","cited_by_count":62,"area":null},{"id":"2211.06651","title":"NLPeer: A Unified Resource for the Computational Study of Peer Review","created":"2022-11-12","cited_by_count":60,"area":null},{"id":"2405.06563","title":"What Can Natural Language Processing Do for Peer Review?","created":"2024-05-10","cited_by_count":25,"area":null},{"id":"2505.07920","title":"Re2: A Consistency-ensured Dataset for Full-stage Peer Review and Multi-turn Rebuttal Discussions","created":"2025-05-12","cited_by_count":23,"area":null},{"id":"2502.13668","title":"PeerQA: A Scientific Question Answering Dataset from Peer Reviews","created":"2025-02-19","cited_by_count":22,"area":null},{"id":"2311.11967","title":"Automatic Analysis of Substantiation in Scientific Peer Reviews","created":"2023-11-20","cited_by_count":19,"area":null},{"id":"2504.16728","title":"IRIS: Interactive Research Ideation System for Accelerating Scientific Discovery","created":"2025-04-23","cited_by_count":19,"area":null},{"id":"2311.03998","title":"Exploring Jiu-Jitsu Argumentation for Writing Peer Review Rebuttals","created":"2023-11-07","cited_by_count":18,"area":null},{"id":"2508.10795","title":"Beyond \"Not Novel Enough\": Enriching Scholarly Critique with LLM-Assisted Feedback","created":"2025-08-14","cited_by_count":12,"area":null},{"id":"2406.00197","title":"Re3: A Holistic Framework and Dataset for Modeling Collaborative Document Revision","created":"2024-05-31","cited_by_count":11,"area":null},{"id":"2511.15462","title":"Insights from the ICLR Peer Review and Rebuttal Process","created":"2025-11-19","cited_by_count":11,"area":null},{"id":"2601.14171","title":"Paper2Rebuttal: A Multi-Agent Framework for Transparent Author Response Assistance","created":"2026-01-20","cited_by_count":9,"area":null},{"id":"2403.04382","title":"Acceleron: A Tool to Accelerate Research Ideation","created":"2024-03-07","cited_by_count":6,"area":null},{"id":"2502.11193","title":"Large Language Models Penetration in Scholarly Writing and Peer Review","created":"2025-02-16","cited_by_count":6,"area":null},{"id":"2604.27924","title":"Can AI Be a Good Peer Reviewer? A Survey of Peer Review Process, Evaluation, and the Future","created":"2026-04-30","cited_by_count":6,"area":null},{"id":"2505.21537","title":"OpenReview Should be Protected and Leveraged as a Community Asset for Research in the Era of Large Language Models","created":"2025-05-24","cited_by_count":5,"area":null},{"id":"2504.06910","title":"Identifying Aspects in Peer Reviews","created":"2025-04-09","cited_by_count":4,"area":null},{"id":"2505.15031","title":"Are the confidence scores of reviewers consistent with the review content? Evidence from top conference proceedings in AI","created":"2025-05-21","cited_by_count":4,"area":null},{"id":"2602.11173","title":"Author-in-the-Loop Response Generation and Evaluation: Integrating Author Expertise and Intent in Responses to Peer Review","created":"2026-01-19","cited_by_count":4,"area":null},{"id":"2603.27360","title":"Defend: Automated Rebuttals for Peer Review with Minimal Author Guidance","created":"2026-03-28","cited_by_count":4,"area":null},{"id":"2508.05283","title":"Decision-Making with Deliberation: Meta-reviewing as a Document-grounded Dialogue","created":"2025-08-07","cited_by_count":3,"area":null},{"id":"2604.19502","title":"Beyond Rating: A Comprehensive Evaluation and Benchmark for AI Reviews","created":"2026-04-21","cited_by_count":3,"area":null},{"id":"2604.19998","title":"What Makes a Good AI Review? Concern-Level Diagnostics for AI Peer Review","created":"2026-04-21","cited_by_count":2,"area":null},{"id":"2505.12028","title":"Towards Comprehensive Argument Analysis in Education: Dataset, Tasks, and Method","created":"2025-05-17","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2602.13817","title":"What happens when reviewers receive AI feedback in their reviews?","created":"2026-02-14","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2607.27845","title":"AutoSupervision: Closing the Feedback Loop in Scientific Workflows with Grounded Revision Verification","created":"2026-07-30","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2211.05604","title":"An Inclusive Notion of Text","created":"2022-11-10","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2602.10118","title":"Reviewing the Reviewer: LLM-Assisted Reviewer Feedback Generation for Guideline Compliance","created":"2026-01-17","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2606.22166","title":"Rebuttals Move Peer-Review Scores, but Initial-Review Structure Bounds the Movement","created":"2026-06-20","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2609.11460","title":"ReGround: Grounding Reviewer Comments in Multimodal Evidence","created":"2026-09-10","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2610.18820","title":"Read the Room Before Your Model Generates","created":"2026-10-13","cited_by_count":0,"area":null}],"next_cursor":null}