{"total":48,"rows":[{"id":"2305.13169","title":"A Pretrainer's Guide to Training Data: Measuring the Effects of Data Age, Domain Coverage, Quality, & Toxicity","created":"2023-05-22","cited_by_count":182,"area":null},{"id":"2504.09737","title":"Can LLM feedback enhance review quality? A randomized study of 20K reviews at ICLR 2025","created":"2025-04-13","cited_by_count":47,"area":null},{"id":"2306.03262","title":"Has the Machine Learning Review Process Become More Arbitrary as the Field Has Grown? The NeurIPS 2021 Consistency Experiment","created":"2023-06-05","cited_by_count":34,"area":null},{"id":"2505.04966","title":"Position: The AI Conference Peer Review Crisis Demands Author Feedback and Reviewer Rewards","created":"2025-05-08","cited_by_count":34,"area":null},{"id":"2505.11855","title":"When AI Co-Scientists Fail: SPOT-a Benchmark for Automated Verification of Scientific Research","created":"2025-05-17","cited_by_count":26,"area":null},{"id":"2211.06398","title":"Investigating Fairness Disparities in Peer Review: A Language Model Enhanced Approach","created":"2022-11-07","cited_by_count":23,"area":null},{"id":"2506.01372","title":"AI Scientists Fail Without Strong Implementation Capability","created":"2025-06-02","cited_by_count":21,"area":null},{"id":"2510.08867","title":"ReviewerToo: Should AI Join The Program Committee? A Look At The Future of Peer Review","created":"2025-10-09","cited_by_count":16,"area":null},{"id":"2605.03202","title":"Stop Automating Peer Review Without Rigorous Evaluation","created":"2026-05-04","cited_by_count":14,"area":null},{"id":"2402.05359","title":"An Examination on the Effectiveness of Divide-and-Conquer Prompting in Large Language Models","created":"2024-02-08","cited_by_count":12,"area":null},{"id":"2510.13201","title":"Paper Copilot: Tracking the Evolution of Peer Review in AI Conferences","created":"2025-10-15","cited_by_count":10,"area":null},{"id":"2607.27191","title":"Can AI agents conduct open-ended AI research? Early evidence from two case studies","created":"2026-07-29","cited_by_count":10,"area":null},{"id":"2506.08134","title":"Position: The ML Community Must Build an AI-Augmented Peer-Review Ecosystem","created":"2025-06-09","cited_by_count":9,"area":null},{"id":"2408.13430","title":"The ICML 2023 Ranking Experiment: Examining Author Self-Assessment in ML/AI Peer Review","created":"2024-08-24","cited_by_count":8,"area":null},{"id":"2506.19882","title":"Position: Machine Learning Conferences Should Establish a \"Refutations and Critiques\" Track","created":"2025-06-24","cited_by_count":7,"area":null},{"id":"2211.12966","title":"How do Authors' Perceptions of their Papers Compare with Co-authors' Perceptions and Peer-review Decisions?","created":"2022-11-22","cited_by_count":6,"area":null},{"id":"2605.20668","title":"On the limits and opportunities of AI reviewers: Reviewing the reviews of Nature-family papers with 45 expert scientists","created":"2026-05-20","cited_by_count":6,"area":null},{"id":"2410.04981","title":"On the Rigour of Scientific Writing: Criteria, Analysis, and Insights","created":"2024-10-07","cited_by_count":5,"area":null},{"id":"2205.01005","title":"What Factors Should Paper-Reviewer Assignments Rely On? Community Perspectives on Issues and Ideals in Conference Peer-Review","created":"2022-05-02","cited_by_count":4,"area":null},{"id":"2410.09649","title":"Learning the Bitter Lesson: Empirical Evidence from 20 Years of CVPR Proceedings","created":"2024-10-12","cited_by_count":4,"area":null},{"id":"2509.25179","title":"NAIPv2: Debiased Pairwise Learning for Efficient Paper Quality Estimation","created":"2025-09-29","cited_by_count":4,"area":null},{"id":"2510.02143","title":"How to Find Fantastic AI Papers: Self-Rankings as a Powerful Predictor of Scientific Impact Beyond Peer Review","created":"2025-10-02","cited_by_count":4,"area":null},{"id":"2305.12811","title":"Label Smarter, Not Harder: CleverLabel for Faster Annotation of Ambiguous Image Classification with Higher Quality","created":"2023-05-22","cited_by_count":3,"area":null},{"id":"2412.14351","title":"Is Peer-Reviewing Worth the Effort?","created":"2024-12-18","cited_by_count":2,"area":null},{"id":"2502.00874","title":"Position: The Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Community Should Adopt a More Transparent and Regulated Peer Review Process","created":"2025-02-02","cited_by_count":2,"area":null},{"id":"2509.21679","title":"ReviewScore: Misinformed Peer Review Detection with Large Language Models","created":"2025-09-25","cited_by_count":2,"area":null},{"id":"2604.19998","title":"What Makes a Good AI Review? Concern-Level Diagnostics for AI Peer Review","created":"2026-04-21","cited_by_count":2,"area":null},{"id":"2605.07905","title":"CoCoReviewBench: A Completeness- and Correctness-Oriented Benchmark for AI Reviewers","created":"2026-05-08","cited_by_count":2,"area":null},{"id":"2605.27072","title":"E3: Issue-Level Backtesting for Automated Research Critique","created":"2026-05-26","cited_by_count":2,"area":null},{"id":"2606.24892","title":"ReviewGuard: Aligning LLM-Assisted Peer Review with Long-Term Scientific Impact","created":"2026-05-29","cited_by_count":2,"area":null},{"id":"2606.28277","title":"Towards Automating Scientific Review with Google's Paper Assistant Tool","created":"2026-06-26","cited_by_count":2,"area":null},{"id":"2607.27209","title":"Reviewer Scores Are Not Comparable Across Research Areas in ML Peer Review","created":"2026-04-30","cited_by_count":2,"area":null},{"id":"2204.08377","title":"Strengthening Subcommunities: Towards Sustainable Growth in AI Research","created":"2022-04-18","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2310.04480","title":"Auto-survey Challenge","created":"2023-10-06","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2601.15249","title":"Recommending Best Paper Awards for ML/AI Conferences via the Isotonic Mechanism","created":"2026-01-21","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2602.00733","title":"EchoReview: Learning Peer Review from the Echoes of Scientific Citations","created":"2026-01-31","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2605.25652","title":"A Two-Phase Stability Study of LLM Judges and Bar Council Examiners on Thai Bar-Exam Free-Form Essays","created":"2026-05-25","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2605.28897","title":"Review Arcade: On the Human Alignment and Gameability of LLM Reviews","created":"2026-05-27","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2306.00586","title":"Evaluating the \"Learning on Graphs\" Conference Experience","created":"2023-06-01","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2311.02790","title":"CausalCite: A Causal Formulation of Paper Citations","created":"2023-11-05","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2311.14619","title":"Eliciting Honest Information From Authors Using Sequential Review","created":"2023-11-24","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2601.19778","title":"Reimagining Peer Review Process Through Multi-Agent Mechanism Design","created":"2026-01-27","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2603.19244","title":"The IJCNN 2025 Review Process","created":"2026-02-19","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2605.27832","title":"Playing with Words, Improving with Rewards: Training Language Models for Creative Association","created":"2026-05-27","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2606.15887","title":"Intelligence Is Not the Bottleneck: Validating an LLM First-Pass Manuscript Score Against Peer-Review Outcomes","created":"2026-06-14","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2608.14571","title":"Position: Want Better ML Reviews? Stop Asking Nicely and Start Incentivizing with a Credit System","created":"2026-06-05","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2610.06591","title":"The Review Lottery: Benchmarking an Observational Estimator of Peer-Review Noise (ICLR 2017-2025)","created":"2026-10-05","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2610.17016","title":"ProbabilityBench: Model Evaluation and Calibration with Exact Ground-Truth Uncertainty","created":"2026-10-12","cited_by_count":0,"area":null}],"next_cursor":null}