{"total":21,"rows":[{"id":"2505.04966","title":"Position: The AI Conference Peer Review Crisis Demands Author Feedback and Reviewer Rewards","created":"2025-05-08","cited_by_count":34,"area":null},{"id":"2211.06398","title":"Investigating Fairness Disparities in Peer Review: A Language Model Enhanced Approach","created":"2022-11-07","cited_by_count":23,"area":null},{"id":"2311.11967","title":"Automatic Analysis of Substantiation in Scientific Peer Reviews","created":"2023-11-20","cited_by_count":19,"area":null},{"id":"2204.04372","title":"A Siren Song of Open Source Reproducibility","created":"2022-04-09","cited_by_count":8,"area":null},{"id":"2508.04586","title":"Position: The Current AI Conference Model is Unsustainable! Diagnosing the Crisis of Centralized AI Conference","created":"2025-08-06","cited_by_count":8,"area":null},{"id":"2210.00443","title":"ReAct: A Review Comment Dataset for Actionability (and more)","created":"2022-10-02","cited_by_count":5,"area":null},{"id":"2106.00810","title":"Some Ethical Issues in the Review Process of Machine Learning Conferences","created":"2021-06-01","cited_by_count":4,"area":null},{"id":"2505.15031","title":"Are the confidence scores of reviewers consistent with the review content? Evidence from top conference proceedings in AI","created":"2025-05-21","cited_by_count":4,"area":null},{"id":"2309.05457","title":"Unveiling the Sentinels: Assessing AI Performance in Cybersecurity Peer Review","created":"2023-09-11","cited_by_count":3,"area":null},{"id":"2502.00874","title":"Position: The Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Community Should Adopt a More Transparent and Regulated Peer Review Process","created":"2025-02-02","cited_by_count":2,"area":null},{"id":"2510.11595","title":"Reproducibility: The New Frontier in AI Governance","created":"2025-10-13","cited_by_count":2,"area":null},{"id":"2607.27209","title":"Reviewer Scores Are Not Comparable Across Research Areas in ML Peer Review","created":"2026-04-30","cited_by_count":2,"area":null},{"id":"2212.06574","title":"Artificial intelligence technologies to support research assessment: A review","created":"2022-12-11","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2602.00733","title":"EchoReview: Learning Peer Review from the Echoes of Scientific Citations","created":"2026-01-31","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2604.19578","title":"Impact of large language models on peer review opinions from a fine-grained perspective: Evidence from top conference proceedings in AI","created":"2026-04-21","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2601.17377","title":"WarrantScore: Modeling Warrants between Claims and Evidence for Substantiation Evaluation in Peer Reviews","created":"2026-01-24","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2604.07119","title":"Are Non-English Papers Reviewed Fairly? Language-of-Study Bias in NLP Peer Reviews","created":"2026-04-08","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2606.22166","title":"Rebuttals Move Peer-Review Scores, but Initial-Review Structure Bounds the Movement","created":"2026-06-20","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2608.02455","title":"Aggregate-then-Calibrate for Human-centered Assessment with Theoretical Guarantees","created":"2026-08-03","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2609.11983","title":"Who Pays for Open Review? Visible Author Reputation and Its Effect on Ratings","created":"2026-09-07","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2610.06591","title":"The Review Lottery: Benchmarking an Observational Estimator of Peer-Review Noise (ICLR 2017-2025)","created":"2026-10-05","cited_by_count":0,"area":null}],"next_cursor":null}