{"total":14,"rows":[{"id":"2306.00622","title":"ReviewerGPT? An Exploratory Study on Using Large Language Models for Paper Reviewing","created":"2023-06-01","cited_by_count":122,"area":null},{"id":"2405.06563","title":"What Can Natural Language Processing Do for Peer Review?","created":"2024-05-10","cited_by_count":25,"area":null},{"id":"2201.11443","title":"Yes-Yes-Yes: Proactive Data Collection for ACL Rolling Review and Beyond","created":"2022-01-27","cited_by_count":12,"area":null},{"id":"2511.15462","title":"Insights from the ICLR Peer Review and Rebuttal Process","created":"2025-11-19","cited_by_count":11,"area":null},{"id":"2402.07860","title":"On the Detection of Reviewer-Author Collusion Rings From Paper Bidding","created":"2024-02-12","cited_by_count":7,"area":null},{"id":"2108.06371","title":"Near-Optimal Reviewer Splitting in Two-Phase Paper Reviewing and Conference Experiment Design","created":"2021-08-13","cited_by_count":6,"area":null},{"id":"2201.10631","title":"Strategyproofing Peer Assessment via Partitioning: The Price in Terms of Evaluators' Expertise","created":"2022-01-25","cited_by_count":6,"area":null},{"id":"2110.12607","title":"Least Square Calibration for Peer Review","created":"2021-10-25","cited_by_count":3,"area":null},{"id":"2107.10121","title":"Peer Selection with Noisy Assessments","created":"2021-07-21","cited_by_count":2,"area":null},{"id":"2410.10009","title":"Enhancing Peer Review in Astronomy: A Machine Learning and Optimization Approach to Reviewer Assignments for ALMA","created":"2024-10-13","cited_by_count":2,"area":null},{"id":"2210.01984","title":"Manipulation and Peer Mechanisms: A Survey","created":"2022-10-05","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2111.04466","title":"Improving Peer Assessment with Graph Convolutional Networks","created":"2021-11-04","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2211.02144","title":"No Agreement Without Loss: Learning and Social Choice in Peer Review","created":"2022-11-03","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2607.10511","title":"Articulate Intuition or Genuine Analysis? Benchmarking Epistemic Reliability in LLM-as-a-Judge Peer Reviews","created":"2026-07-12","cited_by_count":0,"area":null}],"next_cursor":null}