{"total":29,"rows":[{"id":"2202.06935","title":"Repairing the Cracked Foundation: A Survey of Obstacles in Evaluation Practices for Generated Text","created":"2022-02-14","cited_by_count":155,"area":null},{"id":"2107.12708","title":"QA Dataset Explosion: A Taxonomy of NLP Resources for Question Answering and Reading Comprehension","created":"2021-07-27","cited_by_count":91,"area":null},{"id":"2412.11948","title":"OpenReviewer: A Specialized Large Language Model for Generating Critical Scientific Paper Reviews","created":"2024-12-16","cited_by_count":65,"area":null},{"id":"2102.00176","title":"Can We Automate Scientific Reviewing?","created":"2021-01-30","cited_by_count":63,"area":null},{"id":"2211.06651","title":"NLPeer: A Unified Resource for the Computational Study of Peer Review","created":"2022-11-12","cited_by_count":60,"area":null},{"id":"2105.13947","title":"Changing the World by Changing the Data","created":"2021-05-28","cited_by_count":51,"area":null},{"id":"2110.08300","title":"The Dangers of Underclaiming: Reasons for Caution When Reporting How NLP Systems Fail","created":"2021-10-15","cited_by_count":38,"area":null},{"id":"2505.04966","title":"Position: The AI Conference Peer Review Crisis Demands Author Feedback and Reviewer Rewards","created":"2025-05-08","cited_by_count":34,"area":null},{"id":"2405.06563","title":"What Can Natural Language Processing Do for Peer Review?","created":"2024-05-10","cited_by_count":25,"area":null},{"id":"2211.06398","title":"Investigating Fairness Disparities in Peer Review: A Language Model Enhanced Approach","created":"2022-11-07","cited_by_count":23,"area":null},{"id":"2110.14802","title":"You Are the Best Reviewer of Your Own Papers: An Owner-Assisted Scoring Mechanism","created":"2021-10-27","cited_by_count":19,"area":null},{"id":"2304.14238","title":"The Intended Uses of Automated Fact-Checking Artefacts: Why, How and Who","created":"2023-04-27","cited_by_count":19,"area":null},{"id":"2509.04484","title":"The Good, the Bad and the Constructive: Automatically Measuring Peer Review's Utility for Authors","created":"2025-08-31","cited_by_count":16,"area":null},{"id":"2201.11443","title":"Yes-Yes-Yes: Proactive Data Collection for ACL Rolling Review and Beyond","created":"2022-01-27","cited_by_count":12,"area":null},{"id":"2204.06251","title":"Experimental Standards for Deep Learning in Natural Language Processing Research","created":"2022-04-13","cited_by_count":10,"area":null},{"id":"2502.11193","title":"Large Language Models Penetration in Scholarly Writing and Peer Review","created":"2025-02-16","cited_by_count":6,"area":null},{"id":"2105.14473","title":"Determining the Credibility of Science Communication","created":"2021-05-30","cited_by_count":4,"area":null},{"id":"2205.01005","title":"What Factors Should Paper-Reviewer Assignments Rely On? Community Perspectives on Issues and Ideals in Conference Peer-Review","created":"2022-05-02","cited_by_count":4,"area":null},{"id":"2408.06062","title":"On Tables with Numbers, with Numbers","created":"2024-08-12","cited_by_count":4,"area":null},{"id":"2310.18685","title":"When Reviewers Lock Horn: Finding Disagreement in Scientific Peer Reviews","created":"2023-10-28","cited_by_count":2,"area":null},{"id":"2412.14351","title":"Is Peer-Reviewing Worth the Effort?","created":"2024-12-18","cited_by_count":2,"area":null},{"id":"2109.14059","title":"Generating Summaries for Scientific Paper Review","created":"2021-09-28","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2105.02935","title":"Text similarity analysis for evaluation of descriptive answers","created":"2021-05-06","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2107.06310","title":"What do writing features tell us about AI papers?","created":"2021-07-13","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2507.10559","title":"NLP Meets the World: Toward Improving Conversations With the Public About Natural Language Processing Research","created":"2025-07-02","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2601.15172","title":"Is Peer Review Really in Decline? Analyzing Review Quality across Venues and Time","created":"2026-01-21","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2605.10171","title":"When Reviews Disagree: Fine-Grained Contradiction Analysis in Scientific Peer Reviews","created":"2026-05-11","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2608.14571","title":"Position: Want Better ML Reviews? Stop Asking Nicely and Start Incentivizing with a Credit System","created":"2026-06-05","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2609.25046","title":"Peerify: Benchmarking Peer-Review Claim Verification","created":"2026-09-02","cited_by_count":0,"area":null}],"next_cursor":null}