{"total":36,"rows":[{"id":"2306.00622","title":"ReviewerGPT? An Exploratory Study on Using Large Language Models for Paper Reviewing","created":"2023-06-01","cited_by_count":122,"area":null},{"id":"2102.00176","title":"Can We Automate Scientific Reviewing?","created":"2021-01-30","cited_by_count":63,"area":null},{"id":"2405.06563","title":"What Can Natural Language Processing Do for Peer Review?","created":"2024-05-10","cited_by_count":25,"area":null},{"id":"2211.06398","title":"Investigating Fairness Disparities in Peer Review: A Language Model Enhanced Approach","created":"2022-11-07","cited_by_count":23,"area":null},{"id":"2110.14802","title":"You Are the Best Reviewer of Your Own Papers: An Owner-Assisted Scoring Mechanism","created":"2021-10-27","cited_by_count":19,"area":null},{"id":"2202.12273","title":"Matching Papers and Reviewers at Large Conferences","created":"2022-02-24","cited_by_count":18,"area":null},{"id":"2411.03417","title":"Usefulness of LLMs as an Author Checklist Assistant for Scientific Papers: NeurIPS'24 Experiment","created":"2024-11-05","cited_by_count":16,"area":null},{"id":"2102.06020","title":"Making Paper Reviewing Robust to Bid Manipulation Attacks","created":"2021-02-09","cited_by_count":12,"area":null},{"id":"2303.16750","title":"A Gold Standard Dataset for the Reviewer Assignment Problem","created":"2023-03-23","cited_by_count":11,"area":null},{"id":"2310.14483","title":"Chain-of-Factors Paper-Reviewer Matching","created":"2023-10-23","cited_by_count":11,"area":null},{"id":"2207.02303","title":"A Dataset on Malicious Paper Bidding in Peer Review","created":"2022-06-24","cited_by_count":9,"area":null},{"id":"2407.20684","title":"RevGNN: Negative Sampling Enhanced Contrastive Graph Learning for Academic Reviewer Recommendation","created":"2024-07-30","cited_by_count":8,"area":null},{"id":"2408.13430","title":"The ICML 2023 Ranking Experiment: Examining Author Self-Assessment in ML/AI Peer Review","created":"2024-08-24","cited_by_count":8,"area":null},{"id":"2303.14443","title":"No more Reviewer #2: Subverting Automatic Paper-Reviewer Assignment using Adversarial Learning","created":"2023-03-25","cited_by_count":7,"area":null},{"id":"2402.07860","title":"On the Detection of Reviewer-Author Collusion Rings From Paper Bidding","created":"2024-02-12","cited_by_count":7,"area":null},{"id":"2412.06606","title":"Vulnerability of Text-Matching in ML/AI Conference Reviewer Assignments to Collusions","created":"2024-12-09","cited_by_count":7,"area":null},{"id":"2108.06371","title":"Near-Optimal Reviewer Splitting in Two-Phase Paper Reviewing and Conference Experiment Design","created":"2021-08-13","cited_by_count":6,"area":null},{"id":"2112.08444","title":"Combating Collusion Rings is Hard but Possible","created":"2021-12-14","cited_by_count":6,"area":null},{"id":"2201.10631","title":"Strategyproofing Peer Assessment via Partitioning: The Price in Terms of Evaluators' Expertise","created":"2022-01-25","cited_by_count":6,"area":null},{"id":"2211.12966","title":"How do Authors' Perceptions of their Papers Compare with Co-authors' Perceptions and Peer-review Decisions?","created":"2022-11-22","cited_by_count":6,"area":null},{"id":"2304.11160","title":"Isotonic Mechanism for Exponential Family Estimation in Machine Learning Peer Review","created":"2023-04-21","cited_by_count":6,"area":null},{"id":"2106.00810","title":"Some Ethical Issues in the Review Process of Machine Learning Conferences","created":"2021-06-01","cited_by_count":4,"area":null},{"id":"2207.11315","title":"Tradeoffs in Preventing Manipulation in Paper Bidding for Reviewer Assignment","created":"2022-07-22","cited_by_count":4,"area":null},{"id":"2305.07887","title":"Reviewer assignment problem: A scoping review","created":"2023-05-13","cited_by_count":4,"area":null},{"id":"2508.04024","title":"Identity Theft in AI Conference Peer Review","created":"2025-08-06","cited_by_count":3,"area":null},{"id":"2109.00923","title":"Auctions and Peer Prediction for Academic Peer Review","created":"2021-08-27","cited_by_count":2,"area":null},{"id":"2411.02654","title":"Fair and Welfare-Efficient Constrained Multi-matchings under Uncertainty","created":"2024-11-04","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2411.11437","title":"Causal Effect of Group Diversity on Redundancy and Coverage in Peer-Reviewing","created":"2024-11-18","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2601.15249","title":"Recommending Best Paper Awards for ML/AI Conferences via the Isotonic Mechanism","created":"2026-01-21","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2111.04466","title":"Improving Peer Assessment with Graph Convolutional Networks","created":"2021-11-04","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2311.14619","title":"Eliciting Honest Information From Authors Using Sequential Review","created":"2023-11-24","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2412.00546","title":"Rank It, Then Ask It: Input Reranking for Maximizing the Performance of LLMs on Symmetric Tasks","created":"2024-11-30","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2510.12692","title":"Who is a Better Matchmaker? Human vs. Algorithmic Judge Assignment in a High-Stakes Startup Competition","created":"2025-10-14","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2512.17950","title":"Which Coauthor Should I Nominate in My 99 ICLR Submissions? A Mathematical Analysis of the ICLR 2026 Reciprocal Reviewer Nomination Policy","created":"2025-12-17","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2602.06078","title":"Allocate Marginal Reviews to Borderline Papers Using LLM Comparative Ranking","created":"2026-02-04","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2605.20069","title":"Smooth Partial Lotteries for Stable Randomized Selection","created":"2026-05-19","cited_by_count":0,"area":null}],"next_cursor":null}