{"total":62,"rows":[{"id":"2307.10169","title":"Challenges and Applications of Large Language Models","created":"2023-07-19","cited_by_count":254,"area":null},{"id":"2103.06268","title":"CUAD: An Expert-Annotated NLP Dataset for Legal Contract Review","created":"2021-03-10","cited_by_count":236,"area":null},{"id":"2110.01799","title":"ContractNLI: A Dataset for Document-level Natural Language Inference for Contracts","created":"2021-10-05","cited_by_count":148,"area":null},{"id":"2302.06100","title":"Can GPT-3 Perform Statutory Reasoning?","created":"2023-02-13","cited_by_count":73,"area":null},{"id":"2212.02199","title":"Legal Prompt Engineering for Multilingual Legal Judgement Prediction","created":"2022-12-05","cited_by_count":55,"area":null},{"id":"2305.13252","title":"\"According to ...\": Prompting Language Models Improves Quoting from Pre-Training Data","created":"2023-05-22","cited_by_count":42,"area":null},{"id":"2108.11792","title":"A Statutory Article Retrieval Dataset in French","created":"2021-08-26","cited_by_count":40,"area":null},{"id":"2505.03970","title":"A Reasoning-Focused Legal Retrieval Benchmark","created":"2025-05-06","cited_by_count":37,"area":"lr"},{"id":"2309.17050","title":"Interpretable Long-Form Legal Question Answering with Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models","created":"2023-09-29","cited_by_count":35,"area":"rag"},{"id":"2406.00936","title":"A Survey of Useful LLM Evaluation","created":"2024-06-03","cited_by_count":29,"area":null},{"id":"2104.08825","title":"Flexible Generation of Natural Language Deductions","created":"2021-04-18","cited_by_count":28,"area":null},{"id":"2105.07903","title":"Factoring Statutory Reasoning as Language Understanding Challenges","created":"2021-05-17","cited_by_count":20,"area":null},{"id":"2407.16695","title":"Stress-Testing Long-Context Language Models with Lifelong ICL and Task Haystack","created":"2024-07-23","cited_by_count":19,"area":null},{"id":"2406.17186","title":"CLERC: A Dataset for Legal Case Retrieval and Retrieval-Augmented Analysis Generation","created":"2024-06-24","cited_by_count":18,"area":"rag"},{"id":"2302.00609","title":"Zero-shot Transfer of Article-aware Legal Outcome Classification for European Court of Human Rights Cases","created":"2023-02-01","cited_by_count":14,"area":null},{"id":"2511.04662","title":"VeriCoT: Neuro-symbolic Chain-of-Thought Validation via Logical Consistency Checks","created":"2025-11-06","cited_by_count":11,"area":"lr"},{"id":"2110.07333","title":"A Survey on Legal Question Answering Systems","created":"2021-10-12","cited_by_count":10,"area":null},{"id":"2311.09693","title":"BLT: Can Large Language Models Handle Basic Legal Text?","created":"2023-11-16","cited_by_count":10,"area":null},{"id":"2404.02127","title":"LawInstruct: A Resource for Studying Language Model Adaptation to the Legal Domain","created":"2024-04-02","cited_by_count":10,"area":null},{"id":"2109.15300","title":"Semi-Supervised Text Classification via Self-Pretraining","created":"2021-09-30","cited_by_count":8,"area":null},{"id":"2211.02950","title":"The Legal Argument Reasoning Task in Civil Procedure","created":"2022-11-05","cited_by_count":8,"area":"lr"},{"id":"2604.25031","title":"Faithful Autoformalization via Roundtrip Verification and Repair","created":"2026-04-27","cited_by_count":8,"area":null},{"id":"2109.03731","title":"Cross-Policy Compliance Detection via Question Answering","created":"2021-09-08","cited_by_count":7,"area":null},{"id":"2406.13217","title":"Automating IRAC Analysis in Malaysian Contract Law using a Semi-Structured Knowledge Base","created":"2024-06-19","cited_by_count":5,"area":null},{"id":"2605.25240","title":"JudgmentBench: Comparing Rubric and Preference Evaluation for Quality Assessment","created":"2026-05-24","cited_by_count":5,"area":null},{"id":"2104.13841","title":"Evaluating Document Representations for Content-based Legal Literature Recommendations","created":"2021-04-28","cited_by_count":4,"area":null},{"id":"2306.09918","title":"No Strong Feelings One Way or Another: Re-operationalizing Neutrality in Natural Language Inference","created":"2023-06-16","cited_by_count":4,"area":"lr"},{"id":"2201.11870","title":"Multiple-Source Domain Adaptation via Coordinated Domain Encoders and Paired Classifiers","created":"2022-01-28","cited_by_count":3,"area":null},{"id":"2206.14169","title":"Creation and Analysis of an International Corpus of Privacy Laws","created":"2022-06-28","cited_by_count":3,"area":null},{"id":"2404.09868","title":"Software Engineering Methods For AI-Driven Deductive Legal Reasoning","created":"2024-04-15","cited_by_count":3,"area":"lr"},{"id":"2503.03444","title":"Taxation Perspectives from Large Language Models: A Case Study on Additional Tax Penalties","created":"2025-03-05","cited_by_count":3,"area":null},{"id":"2601.13183","title":"OpenExempt: A Diagnostic Benchmark for Legal Reasoning and a Framework for Creating Custom Benchmarks on Demand","created":"2026-01-19","cited_by_count":3,"area":"lr"},{"id":"2606.16118","title":"Know Your Limits : On the Faithfulness of LLMs as Solvers and Autoformalizers in Legal Reasoning","created":"2026-06-15","cited_by_count":3,"area":"lr"},{"id":"2309.09070","title":"NOWJ1@ALQAC 2023: Enhancing Legal Task Performance with Classic Statistical Models and Pre-trained Language Models","created":"2023-09-16","cited_by_count":2,"area":null},{"id":"2607.27783","title":"Reasoning Consensus: Structural Ensembling of LLM Reasoning via Weighted DAG Aggregation","created":"2026-07-30","cited_by_count":2,"area":"lr"},{"id":"2205.12259","title":"Policy Compliance Detection via Expression Tree Inference","created":"2022-05-24","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2210.16989","title":"Validity Assessment of Legal Will Statements as Natural Language Inference","created":"2022-10-30","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2412.06272","title":"Evaluating LLM-based Approaches to Legal Citation Prediction: Domain-specific Pre-training, Fine-tuning, or RAG? A Benchmark and an Australian Law Case Study","created":"2024-12-09","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2412.20468","title":"A Comprehensive Framework for Reliable Legal AI: Combining Specialized Expert Systems and Adaptive Refinement","created":"2024-12-29","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2502.06147","title":"LegalViz: Legal Text Visualization by Text To Diagram Generation","created":"2025-02-10","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2601.15267","title":"Evaluation of Large Language Models in Legal Applications: Challenges, Methods, and Future Directions","created":"2026-01-21","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2603.04718","title":"AI-Assisted Moot Courts: Simulating Justice-Specific Questioning in Oral Arguments","created":"2026-03-05","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2603.22973","title":"Where Experts Disagree, Models Fail: Detecting Implicit Legal Citations in French Court Decisions","created":"2026-03-24","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2606.08932","title":"From Statute to Control Flow: Span-Grounded Deontic Trees for Defeasible Scope Parsing","created":"2026-06-08","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2609.21492","title":"LogicTrack: Auditing Reasoning Trajectories of Large Language Models with Formal Logic Solvers","created":"2026-09-18","cited_by_count":1,"area":"lr"},{"id":"2412.11787","title":"A Method for Detecting Legal Article Competition for Korean Criminal Law Using a Case-augmented Mention Graph","created":"2024-12-16","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2504.16353","title":"Transformer-Based Extraction of Statutory Definitions from the U.S. Code","created":"2025-04-23","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2511.11954","title":"LLM-Assisted Formalization Enables Deterministic Detection of Statutory Inconsistency in the Internal Revenue Code","created":"2025-11-15","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2511.14671","title":"Streamlining Industrial Contract Management with Retrieval-Augmented LLMs","created":"2025-11-18","cited_by_count":0,"area":"rag"},{"id":"2604.19895","title":"Learning When Not to Decide: A Framework for Overcoming Factual Presumptuousness in AI Adjudication","created":"2026-04-21","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2605.16052","title":"Reasoners or Translators? Contamination-aware Evaluation and Neuro-Symbolic Robustness in Tax Law","created":"2026-05-15","cited_by_count":0,"area":"lr"},{"id":"2605.19815","title":"LP-Eval: Rubric and Dataset for Measuring the Quality of Legal Proposition Generation","created":"2026-05-19","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2606.19334","title":"Freeing the Law with LOCUS: A Local Ordinance Corpus for the United States","created":"2026-06-17","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2607.16122","title":"CRAFT: Clustering Rubrics to Diagnose Weak LLM Capabilities and Generate Targeted Fine-Tuning Data","created":"2026-07-17","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2607.22683","title":"Imprompt: A Language Framework for Prompt Programming","created":"2026-07-13","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2608.10268","title":"Toward Human Rights Benchmarking for LLMs: A Pilot Methodology","created":"2026-08-10","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2608.15270","title":"Time as Structure: Temporal Dependency Graphs for Verifiable Deadline Computation over Legal Documents","created":"2026-08-15","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2608.22229","title":"Grounded Normative Rule Generation with Structured Search","created":"2026-08-23","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2608.23395","title":"Right-Sizing LLM-Agent Decomposition in VAT Determination: A Pilot Controlled Sweep","created":"2026-08-24","cited_by_count":0,"area":"agents"},{"id":"2609.05928","title":"Solving versus Verifying: Catching Contradictions in Tax Reasoning Systems","created":"2026-09-05","cited_by_count":0,"area":"lr"},{"id":"2609.18908","title":"How Much is a Human Right Worth? ECtHR-NPD: A Benchmark for Predicting Non-Pecuniary Damage Awards","created":"2026-09-16","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2610.02792","title":"Law And Order: Tax Law Autoformalization","created":"2026-10-02","cited_by_count":0,"area":null}],"next_cursor":null}