{"total":14,"rows":[{"id":"2102.00176","title":"Can We Automate Scientific Reviewing?","created":"2021-01-30","cited_by_count":63,"area":null},{"id":"2211.06398","title":"Investigating Fairness Disparities in Peer Review: A Language Model Enhanced Approach","created":"2022-11-07","cited_by_count":23,"area":null},{"id":"2110.14802","title":"You Are the Best Reviewer of Your Own Papers: An Owner-Assisted Scoring Mechanism","created":"2021-10-27","cited_by_count":19,"area":null},{"id":"2102.06020","title":"Making Paper Reviewing Robust to Bid Manipulation Attacks","created":"2021-02-09","cited_by_count":12,"area":null},{"id":"2108.06371","title":"Near-Optimal Reviewer Splitting in Two-Phase Paper Reviewing and Conference Experiment Design","created":"2021-08-13","cited_by_count":6,"area":null},{"id":"2201.10631","title":"Strategyproofing Peer Assessment via Partitioning: The Price in Terms of Evaluators' Expertise","created":"2022-01-25","cited_by_count":6,"area":null},{"id":"2310.18685","title":"When Reviewers Lock Horn: Finding Disagreement in Scientific Peer Reviews","created":"2023-10-28","cited_by_count":2,"area":null},{"id":"2607.27209","title":"Reviewer Scores Are Not Comparable Across Research Areas in ML Peer Review","created":"2026-04-30","cited_by_count":2,"area":null},{"id":"2107.06310","title":"What do writing features tell us about AI papers?","created":"2021-07-13","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2501.13014","title":"Paper Quality Assessment based on Individual Wisdom Metrics from Open Peer Review","created":"2025-01-22","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2512.17950","title":"Which Coauthor Should I Nominate in My 99 ICLR Submissions? A Mathematical Analysis of the ICLR 2026 Reciprocal Reviewer Nomination Policy","created":"2025-12-17","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2605.10171","title":"When Reviews Disagree: Fine-Grained Contradiction Analysis in Scientific Peer Reviews","created":"2026-05-11","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2606.13452","title":"Examining the Cognitive Gap Between Authors and Peer Reviewers on Academic Paper Novelty","created":"2026-06-11","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2606.15887","title":"Intelligence Is Not the Bottleneck: Validating an LLM First-Pass Manuscript Score Against Peer-Review Outcomes","created":"2026-06-14","cited_by_count":0,"area":null}],"next_cursor":null}