{"total":170,"rows":[{"id":"2307.06435","title":"A Comprehensive Overview of Large Language Models","created":"2023-07-12","cited_by_count":648,"area":null},{"id":"2107.02137","title":"ERNIE 3.0: Large-scale Knowledge Enhanced Pre-training for Language Understanding and Generation","created":"2021-07-05","cited_by_count":260,"area":null},{"id":"2309.11325","title":"DISC-LawLLM: Fine-tuning Large Language Models for Intelligent Legal Services","created":"2023-09-20","cited_by_count":120,"area":null},{"id":"2105.03887","title":"Lawformer: A Pre-trained Language Model for Chinese Legal Long Documents","created":"2021-05-09","cited_by_count":116,"area":null},{"id":"2105.13562","title":"ILDC for CJPE: Indian Legal Documents Corpus for Court Judgment Prediction and Explanation","created":"2021-05-28","cited_by_count":78,"area":null},{"id":"2110.00806","title":"Swiss-Judgment-Prediction: A Multilingual Legal Judgment Prediction Benchmark","created":"2021-10-02","cited_by_count":60,"area":null},{"id":"2303.10845","title":"PanGu-{\\Sigma}: Towards Trillion Parameter Language Model with Sparse Heterogeneous Computing","created":"2023-03-20","cited_by_count":56,"area":null},{"id":"2305.15062","title":"Lawyer LLaMA Technical Report","created":"2023-05-24","cited_by_count":54,"area":null},{"id":"2303.09136","title":"A Short Survey of Viewing Large Language Models in Legal Aspect","created":"2023-03-16","cited_by_count":52,"area":null},{"id":"2204.04859","title":"A Survey on Legal Judgment Prediction: Datasets, Metrics, Models and Challenges","created":"2022-04-11","cited_by_count":50,"area":null},{"id":"2203.07228","title":"FairLex: A Multilingual Benchmark for Evaluating Fairness in Legal Text Processing","created":"2022-03-14","cited_by_count":49,"area":null},{"id":"2112.12731","title":"ERNIE 3.0 Titan: Exploring Larger-scale Knowledge Enhanced Pre-training for Language Understanding and Generation","created":"2021-12-23","cited_by_count":46,"area":null},{"id":"2206.05224","title":"A Multi-Task Benchmark for Korean Legal Language Understanding and Judgement Prediction","created":"2022-06-10","cited_by_count":44,"area":null},{"id":"2410.21306","title":"Natural Language Processing for the Legal Domain: A Survey of Tasks, Datasets, Models, and Challenges","created":"2024-10-25","cited_by_count":42,"area":null},{"id":"2108.11792","title":"A Statutory Article Retrieval Dataset in French","created":"2021-08-26","cited_by_count":40,"area":null},{"id":"2403.02959","title":"AgentsCourt: Building Judicial Decision-Making Agents with Court Debate Simulation and Legal Knowledge Augmentation","created":"2024-03-05","cited_by_count":40,"area":"agents"},{"id":"2307.08321","title":"Legal Syllogism Prompting: Teaching Large Language Models for Legal Judgment Prediction","created":"2023-07-17","cited_by_count":38,"area":"lr"},{"id":"2409.20288","title":"LexEval: A Comprehensive Chinese Legal Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language Models","created":"2024-09-30","cited_by_count":37,"area":null},{"id":"2203.08556","title":"LEVEN: A Large-Scale Chinese Legal Event Detection Dataset","created":"2022-03-16","cited_by_count":36,"area":null},{"id":"2310.11761","title":"A Comprehensive Evaluation of Large Language Models on Legal Judgment Prediction","created":"2023-10-18","cited_by_count":28,"area":null},{"id":"2501.06521","title":"Fine-tuning Large Language Models for Improving Factuality in Legal Question Answering","created":"2025-01-11","cited_by_count":28,"area":null},{"id":"2201.13125","title":"Corpus for Automatic Structuring of Legal Documents","created":"2022-01-31","cited_by_count":25,"area":null},{"id":"2107.05192","title":"Legal Judgment Prediction with Multi-Stage CaseRepresentation Learning in the Real Court Setting","created":"2021-07-12","cited_by_count":24,"area":null},{"id":"2112.14731","title":"LeSICiN: A Heterogeneous Graph-based Approach for Automatic Legal Statute Identification from Indian Legal Documents","created":"2021-12-29","cited_by_count":23,"area":null},{"id":"2407.08440","title":"Beyond Instruction Following: Evaluating Inferential Rule Following of Large Language Models","created":"2024-07-11","cited_by_count":23,"area":null},{"id":"2105.07903","title":"Factoring Statutory Reasoning as Language Understanding Challenges","created":"2021-05-17","cited_by_count":20,"area":null},{"id":"2312.05762","title":"Multi-Defendant Legal Judgment Prediction via Hierarchical Reasoning","created":"2023-12-10","cited_by_count":19,"area":null},{"id":"2502.20640","title":"LexRAG: Benchmarking Retrieval-Augmented Generation in Multi-Turn Legal Consultation Conversation","created":"2025-02-28","cited_by_count":19,"area":"rag"},{"id":"2308.10529","title":"SeqGPT: An Out-of-the-box Large Language Model for Open Domain Sequence Understanding","created":"2023-08-21","cited_by_count":18,"area":null},{"id":"2407.01964","title":"Enabling Discriminative Reasoning in LLMs for Legal Judgment Prediction","created":"2024-07-02","cited_by_count":17,"area":"lr"},{"id":"2208.08225","title":"On the Role of Negative Precedent in Legal Outcome Prediction","created":"2022-08-17","cited_by_count":16,"area":null},{"id":"2209.12325","title":"An Empirical Study on Cross-X Transfer for Legal Judgment Prediction","created":"2022-09-25","cited_by_count":16,"area":null},{"id":"2306.09237","title":"One Law, Many Languages: Benchmarking Multilingual Legal Reasoning for Judicial Support","created":"2023-06-15","cited_by_count":16,"area":"lr"},{"id":"2104.10726","title":"Learning Fine-grained Fact-Article Correspondence in Legal Cases","created":"2021-04-21","cited_by_count":15,"area":null},{"id":"2109.15298","title":"Multi-granular Legal Topic Classification on Greek Legislation","created":"2021-09-30","cited_by_count":15,"area":null},{"id":"2406.04136","title":"Legal Judgment Reimagined: PredEx and the Rise of Intelligent AI Interpretation in Indian Courts","created":"2024-06-06","cited_by_count":15,"area":null},{"id":"2601.16669","title":"PLawBench: A Rubric-Based Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs in Real-World Legal Practice","created":"2026-01-23","cited_by_count":15,"area":null},{"id":"2104.09420","title":"Everything Has a Cause: Leveraging Causal Inference in Legal Text Analysis","created":"2021-04-19","cited_by_count":14,"area":null},{"id":"2305.05393","title":"CaseEncoder: A Knowledge-enhanced Pre-trained Model for Legal Case Encoding","created":"2023-05-09","cited_by_count":14,"area":null},{"id":"2309.12269","title":"The Cambridge Law Corpus: A Dataset for Legal AI Research","created":"2023-09-21","cited_by_count":14,"area":null},{"id":"2407.16252","title":"LawLuo: A Multi-Agent Collaborative Framework for Multi-Round Chinese Legal Consultation","created":"2024-07-23","cited_by_count":14,"area":"agents"},{"id":"2410.02507","title":"Can Large Language Models Grasp Legal Theories? Enhance Legal Reasoning with Insights from Multi-Agent Collaboration","created":"2024-10-03","cited_by_count":14,"area":"lr"},{"id":"2112.06370","title":"Dependency Learning for Legal Judgment Prediction with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformer","created":"2021-12-13","cited_by_count":13,"area":null},{"id":"2408.06904","title":"Re-TASK: Revisiting LLM Tasks from Capability, Skill, and Knowledge Perspectives","created":"2024-08-13","cited_by_count":13,"area":"lr"},{"id":"2310.03328","title":"Reformulating Domain Adaptation of Large Language Models as Adapt-Retrieve-Revise: A Case Study on Chinese Legal Domain","created":"2023-10-05","cited_by_count":12,"area":null},{"id":"2508.12281","title":"Legal$\\Delta$: Enhancing Legal Reasoning in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning with Chain-of-Thought Guided Information Gain","created":"2025-08-17","cited_by_count":12,"area":"lr"},{"id":"2103.13868","title":"Equality before the Law: Legal Judgment Consistency Analysis for Fairness","created":"2021-03-25","cited_by_count":11,"area":null},{"id":"2202.13558","title":"CINO: A Chinese Minority Pre-trained Language Model","created":"2022-02-28","cited_by_count":11,"area":null},{"id":"2204.00806","title":"HLDC: Hindi Legal Documents Corpus","created":"2022-04-02","cited_by_count":11,"area":null},{"id":"2311.09693","title":"BLT: Can Large Language Models Handle Basic Legal Text?","created":"2023-11-16","cited_by_count":10,"area":null},{"id":"2311.13350","title":"Fact-based Court Judgment Prediction","created":"2023-11-22","cited_by_count":10,"area":null},{"id":"2404.02127","title":"LawInstruct: A Resource for Studying Language Model Adaptation to the Legal Domain","created":"2024-04-02","cited_by_count":10,"area":null},{"id":"2406.15313","title":"STARD: A Chinese Statute Retrieval Dataset with Real Queries Issued by Non-professionals","created":"2024-06-21","cited_by_count":10,"area":null},{"id":"2410.10542","title":"Rethinking Legal Judgement Prediction in a Realistic Scenario in the Era of Large Language Models","created":"2024-10-14","cited_by_count":10,"area":"lr"},{"id":"2412.18697","title":"Agents on the Bench: Large Language Model Based Multi Agent Framework for Trustworthy Digital Justice","created":"2024-12-24","cited_by_count":10,"area":"agents"},{"id":"2509.09969","title":"Large Language Models Meet Legal Artificial Intelligence: A Survey","created":"2025-09-12","cited_by_count":10,"area":null},{"id":"2605.08741","title":"Training with Harnesses: On-Policy Harness Self-Distillation for Complex Reasoning","created":"2026-05-09","cited_by_count":10,"area":"lr"},{"id":"2112.03414","title":"JUSTICE: A Benchmark Dataset for Supreme Court's Judgment Prediction","created":"2021-12-06","cited_by_count":9,"area":null},{"id":"2310.05620","title":"LAiW: A Chinese Legal Large Language Models Benchmark","created":"2023-10-09","cited_by_count":9,"area":null},{"id":"2310.11049","title":"Nonet at SemEval-2023 Task 6: Methodologies for Legal Evaluation","created":"2023-10-17","cited_by_count":9,"area":null},{"id":"2504.05358","title":"Debate-Feedback: A Multi-Agent Framework for Efficient Legal Judgment Prediction","created":"2025-04-07","cited_by_count":9,"area":"agents"},{"id":"2508.03080","title":"ContractEval: Benchmarking LLMs for Clause-Level Legal Risk Identification in Commercial Contracts","created":"2025-08-05","cited_by_count":9,"area":null},{"id":"2211.08238","title":"Exploiting Contrastive Learning and Numerical Evidence for Confusing Legal Judgment Prediction","created":"2022-11-15","cited_by_count":8,"area":null},{"id":"2502.06572","title":"LawGPT: Knowledge-Guided Data Generation and Its Application to Legal LLM","created":"2025-02-10","cited_by_count":8,"area":null},{"id":"2502.17943","title":"CaseGen: A Benchmark for Multi-Stage Legal Case Documents Generation","created":"2025-02-25","cited_by_count":8,"area":null},{"id":"2508.17322","title":"Chinese Court Simulation with LLM-Based Agent System","created":"2025-08-24","cited_by_count":8,"area":"agents"},{"id":"2601.07296","title":"LRAS: Advanced Legal Reasoning with Agentic Search","created":"2026-01-12","cited_by_count":8,"area":"lr"},{"id":"2503.18360","title":"J&H: Evaluating the Robustness of Large Language Models Under Knowledge-Injection Attacks in Legal Domain","created":"2025-03-24","cited_by_count":7,"area":null},{"id":"2504.02590","title":"Legal Mathematical Reasoning with LLMs: Procedural Alignment through Two-Stage Reinforcement Learning","created":"2025-04-03","cited_by_count":7,"area":"lr"},{"id":"2404.00990","title":"Exploring the Nexus of Large Language Models and Legal Systems: A Short Survey","created":"2024-04-01","cited_by_count":6,"area":null},{"id":"2412.14588","title":"Beyond Guilt: Legal Judgment Prediction with Trichotomous Reasoning","created":"2024-12-19","cited_by_count":6,"area":"lr"},{"id":"2508.00709","title":"NyayaRAG: Realistic Legal Judgment Prediction with RAG under the Indian Common Law System","created":"2025-08-01","cited_by_count":6,"area":null},{"id":"2508.16383","title":"GLARE: Agentic Reasoning for Legal Judgment Prediction","created":"2025-08-22","cited_by_count":6,"area":"lr"},{"id":"2605.19577","title":"GoLongRL: Capability-Oriented Long Context Reinforcement Learning with Multitask Alignment","created":"2026-05-19","cited_by_count":6,"area":null},{"id":"2312.00480","title":"Japanese Tort-case Dataset for Rationale-supported Legal Judgment Prediction","created":"2023-12-01","cited_by_count":5,"area":null},{"id":"2406.14887","title":"InternLM-Law: An Open Source Chinese Legal Large Language Model","created":"2024-06-21","cited_by_count":5,"area":null},{"id":"2407.19041","title":"Optimizing Numerical Estimation and Operational Efficiency in the Legal Domain through Large Language Models","created":"2024-07-26","cited_by_count":5,"area":null},{"id":"2408.09422","title":"Distinguish Confusion in Legal Judgment Prediction via Revised Relation Knowledge","created":"2024-08-18","cited_by_count":5,"area":null},{"id":"2409.07055","title":"Legal Fact Prediction: The Missing Piece in Legal Judgment Prediction","created":"2024-09-11","cited_by_count":5,"area":null},{"id":"2409.08098","title":"The CLC-UKET Dataset: Benchmarking Case Outcome Prediction for the UK Employment Tribunal","created":"2024-09-12","cited_by_count":5,"area":null},{"id":"2412.07462","title":"Bilingual BSARD: Extending Statutory Article Retrieval to Dutch","created":"2024-12-10","cited_by_count":5,"area":null},{"id":"2502.17166","title":"JUREX-4E: Juridical Expert-Annotated Four-Element Knowledge Base for Legal Reasoning","created":"2025-02-24","cited_by_count":5,"area":"lr"},{"id":"2504.01840","title":"LRAGE: Legal Retrieval Augmented Generation Evaluation Tool","created":"2025-04-02","cited_by_count":5,"area":"rag"},{"id":"2505.23832","title":"LegalSearchLM: Rethinking Legal Case Retrieval as Legal Elements Generation","created":"2025-05-28","cited_by_count":5,"area":null},{"id":"2511.00268","title":"IL-PCSR: Legal Corpus for Prior Case and Statute Retrieval","created":"2025-10-31","cited_by_count":5,"area":null},{"id":"2605.28120","title":"LegalGraphRAG: Multi-Agent Graph Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Reliable Legal Reasoning","created":"2026-05-27","cited_by_count":5,"area":"lr"},{"id":"2402.11432","title":"Can Deception Detection Go Deeper? Dataset, Evaluation, and Benchmark for Deception Reasoning","created":"2024-02-18","cited_by_count":4,"area":null},{"id":"2403.06872","title":"Exploring Large Language Models and Hierarchical Frameworks for Classification of Large Unstructured Legal Documents","created":"2024-03-11","cited_by_count":4,"area":null},{"id":"2406.04578","title":"SC2: Towards Enhancing Content Preservation and Style Consistency in Long Text Style Transfer","created":"2024-06-07","cited_by_count":4,"area":null},{"id":"2410.11507","title":"TestAgent: Automatic Benchmarking and Exploratory Interaction for Evaluating LLMs in Vertical Domains","created":"2024-10-15","cited_by_count":4,"area":null},{"id":"2412.08385","title":"NyayaAnumana & INLegalLlama: The Largest Indian Legal Judgment Prediction Dataset and Specialized Language Model for Enhanced Decision Analysis","created":"2024-12-11","cited_by_count":4,"area":null},{"id":"2502.18424","title":"Compressing Language Models for Specialized Domains","created":"2025-02-25","cited_by_count":4,"area":null},{"id":"2507.19995","title":"VLQA: The First Comprehensive, Large, and High-Quality Vietnamese Dataset for Legal Question Answering","created":"2025-07-26","cited_by_count":4,"area":null},{"id":"2107.06056","title":"Indian Legal NLP Benchmarks : A Survey","created":"2021-07-13","cited_by_count":3,"area":null},{"id":"2210.17108","title":"Do Charge Prediction Models Learn Legal Theory?","created":"2022-10-31","cited_by_count":3,"area":null},{"id":"2403.04369","title":"From Graph to Word Bag: Introducing Domain Knowledge to Confusing Charge Prediction","created":"2024-03-07","cited_by_count":3,"area":null},{"id":"2503.00128","title":"AnnoCaseLaw: A Richly-Annotated Dataset For Benchmarking Explainable Legal Judgment Prediction","created":"2025-02-28","cited_by_count":3,"area":null},{"id":"2505.10870","title":"Improve Rule Retrieval and Reasoning with Self-Induction and Relevance ReEstimate","created":"2025-05-16","cited_by_count":3,"area":"lr"},{"id":"2505.14104","title":"Legal Rule Induction: Towards Generalizable Principle Discovery from Analogous Judicial Precedents","created":"2025-05-20","cited_by_count":3,"area":null},{"id":"2506.11555","title":"RAG+: Enhancing Retrieval-Augmented Generation with Application-Aware Reasoning","created":"2025-06-13","cited_by_count":3,"area":"lr"}],"next_cursor":"100"}