{"total":17,"rows":[{"id":"2102.06020","title":"Making Paper Reviewing Robust to Bid Manipulation Attacks","created":"2021-02-09","cited_by_count":12,"area":null},{"id":"2207.02303","title":"A Dataset on Malicious Paper Bidding in Peer Review","created":"2022-06-24","cited_by_count":9,"area":null},{"id":"2108.06371","title":"Near-Optimal Reviewer Splitting in Two-Phase Paper Reviewing and Conference Experiment Design","created":"2021-08-13","cited_by_count":6,"area":null},{"id":"2112.08444","title":"Combating Collusion Rings is Hard but Possible","created":"2021-12-14","cited_by_count":6,"area":null},{"id":"2201.10631","title":"Strategyproofing Peer Assessment via Partitioning: The Price in Terms of Evaluators' Expertise","created":"2022-01-25","cited_by_count":6,"area":null},{"id":"2410.03474","title":"Group Fairness in Peer Review","created":"2024-10-04","cited_by_count":5,"area":null},{"id":"2502.07683","title":"exHarmony: Authorship and Citations for Benchmarking the Reviewer Assignment Problem","created":"2025-02-11","cited_by_count":5,"area":null},{"id":"2107.10121","title":"Peer Selection with Noisy Assessments","created":"2021-07-21","cited_by_count":2,"area":null},{"id":"2109.00923","title":"Auctions and Peer Prediction for Academic Peer Review","created":"2021-08-27","cited_by_count":2,"area":null},{"id":"2210.01984","title":"Manipulation and Peer Mechanisms: A Survey","created":"2022-10-05","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2111.04466","title":"Improving Peer Assessment with Graph Convolutional Networks","created":"2021-11-04","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2211.02144","title":"No Agreement Without Loss: Learning and Social Choice in Peer Review","created":"2022-11-03","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2311.14619","title":"Eliciting Honest Information From Authors Using Sequential Review","created":"2023-11-24","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2510.12692","title":"Who is a Better Matchmaker? Human vs. Algorithmic Judge Assignment in a High-Stakes Startup Competition","created":"2025-10-14","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2512.17950","title":"Which Coauthor Should I Nominate in My 99 ICLR Submissions? A Mathematical Analysis of the ICLR 2026 Reciprocal Reviewer Nomination Policy","created":"2025-12-17","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2601.19778","title":"Reimagining Peer Review Process Through Multi-Agent Mechanism Design","created":"2026-01-27","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2610.19038","title":"Lag: A Mean-Field Optimal Policy for Online Assignment with Reusable Resources","created":"2026-10-13","cited_by_count":0,"area":null}],"next_cursor":null}