{"total":29,"rows":[{"id":"2306.00622","title":"ReviewerGPT? An Exploratory Study on Using Large Language Models for Paper Reviewing","created":"2023-06-01","cited_by_count":122,"area":null},{"id":"2109.06141","title":"On Tilted Losses in Machine Learning: Theory and Applications","created":"2021-09-13","cited_by_count":43,"area":null},{"id":"2405.06563","title":"What Can Natural Language Processing Do for Peer Review?","created":"2024-05-10","cited_by_count":25,"area":null},{"id":"2202.12273","title":"Matching Papers and Reviewers at Large Conferences","created":"2022-02-24","cited_by_count":18,"area":null},{"id":"2304.04250","title":"Editable User Profiles for Controllable Text Recommendation","created":"2023-04-09","cited_by_count":16,"area":null},{"id":"2411.03417","title":"Usefulness of LLMs as an Author Checklist Assistant for Scientific Papers: NeurIPS'24 Experiment","created":"2024-11-05","cited_by_count":16,"area":null},{"id":"2507.23276","title":"How Far Are AI Scientists from Changing the World?","created":"2025-07-31","cited_by_count":15,"area":null},{"id":"2102.06020","title":"Making Paper Reviewing Robust to Bid Manipulation Attacks","created":"2021-02-09","cited_by_count":12,"area":null},{"id":"2303.16750","title":"A Gold Standard Dataset for the Reviewer Assignment Problem","created":"2023-03-23","cited_by_count":11,"area":null},{"id":"2310.14483","title":"Chain-of-Factors Paper-Reviewer Matching","created":"2023-10-23","cited_by_count":11,"area":null},{"id":"2303.14443","title":"No more Reviewer #2: Subverting Automatic Paper-Reviewer Assignment using Adversarial Learning","created":"2023-03-25","cited_by_count":7,"area":null},{"id":"2412.06606","title":"Vulnerability of Text-Matching in ML/AI Conference Reviewer Assignments to Collusions","created":"2024-12-09","cited_by_count":7,"area":null},{"id":"2108.06371","title":"Near-Optimal Reviewer Splitting in Two-Phase Paper Reviewing and Conference Experiment Design","created":"2021-08-13","cited_by_count":6,"area":null},{"id":"2112.08444","title":"Combating Collusion Rings is Hard but Possible","created":"2021-12-14","cited_by_count":6,"area":null},{"id":"2201.10631","title":"Strategyproofing Peer Assessment via Partitioning: The Price in Terms of Evaluators' Expertise","created":"2022-01-25","cited_by_count":6,"area":null},{"id":"2410.03474","title":"Group Fairness in Peer Review","created":"2024-10-04","cited_by_count":5,"area":null},{"id":"2205.01005","title":"What Factors Should Paper-Reviewer Assignments Rely On? Community Perspectives on Issues and Ideals in Conference Peer-Review","created":"2022-05-02","cited_by_count":4,"area":null},{"id":"2102.00311","title":"Fairness through Social Welfare Optimization","created":"2021-01-30","cited_by_count":3,"area":null},{"id":"2607.27209","title":"Reviewer Scores Are Not Comparable Across Research Areas in ML Peer Review","created":"2026-04-30","cited_by_count":2,"area":null},{"id":"2407.13052","title":"Matchings, Predictions and Counterfactual Harm in Refugee Resettlement Processes","created":"2024-05-24","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2410.02977","title":"Harm Ratio: A Novel and Versatile Fairness Criterion","created":"2024-10-03","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2411.02654","title":"Fair and Welfare-Efficient Constrained Multi-matchings under Uncertainty","created":"2024-11-04","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2602.13817","title":"What happens when reviewers receive AI feedback in their reviews?","created":"2026-02-14","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2206.09895","title":"Multiple Fairness and Cardinality constraints for Students-Topics Grouping Problem","created":"2022-06-20","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2301.00006","title":"Recovering Top-Two Answers and Confusion Probability in Multi-Choice Crowdsourcing","created":"2022-12-29","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2510.12692","title":"Who is a Better Matchmaker? Human vs. Algorithmic Judge Assignment in a High-Stakes Startup Competition","created":"2025-10-14","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2512.17950","title":"Which Coauthor Should I Nominate in My 99 ICLR Submissions? A Mathematical Analysis of the ICLR 2026 Reciprocal Reviewer Nomination Policy","created":"2025-12-17","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2602.06078","title":"Allocate Marginal Reviews to Borderline Papers Using LLM Comparative Ranking","created":"2026-02-04","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2603.19244","title":"The IJCNN 2025 Review Process","created":"2026-02-19","cited_by_count":0,"area":null}],"next_cursor":null}