{"total":33,"rows":[{"id":"2412.11948","title":"OpenReviewer: A Specialized Large Language Model for Generating Critical Scientific Paper Reviews","created":"2024-12-16","cited_by_count":65,"area":null},{"id":"2405.06563","title":"What Can Natural Language Processing Do for Peer Review?","created":"2024-05-10","cited_by_count":25,"area":null},{"id":"2506.11113","title":"Breaking the Reviewer: Assessing the Vulnerability of Large Language Models in Automated Peer Review Under Textual Adversarial Attacks","created":"2025-06-08","cited_by_count":16,"area":null},{"id":"2102.06020","title":"Making Paper Reviewing Robust to Bid Manipulation Attacks","created":"2021-02-09","cited_by_count":12,"area":null},{"id":"2303.16750","title":"A Gold Standard Dataset for the Reviewer Assignment Problem","created":"2023-03-23","cited_by_count":11,"area":null},{"id":"2207.02303","title":"A Dataset on Malicious Paper Bidding in Peer Review","created":"2022-06-24","cited_by_count":9,"area":null},{"id":"2408.13430","title":"The ICML 2023 Ranking Experiment: Examining Author Self-Assessment in ML/AI Peer Review","created":"2024-08-24","cited_by_count":8,"area":null},{"id":"2402.07860","title":"On the Detection of Reviewer-Author Collusion Rings From Paper Bidding","created":"2024-02-12","cited_by_count":7,"area":null},{"id":"2108.06371","title":"Near-Optimal Reviewer Splitting in Two-Phase Paper Reviewing and Conference Experiment Design","created":"2021-08-13","cited_by_count":6,"area":null},{"id":"2201.10631","title":"Strategyproofing Peer Assessment via Partitioning: The Price in Terms of Evaluators' Expertise","created":"2022-01-25","cited_by_count":6,"area":null},{"id":"2211.12966","title":"How do Authors' Perceptions of their Papers Compare with Co-authors' Perceptions and Peer-review Decisions?","created":"2022-11-22","cited_by_count":6,"area":null},{"id":"2106.00810","title":"Some Ethical Issues in the Review Process of Machine Learning Conferences","created":"2021-06-01","cited_by_count":4,"area":null},{"id":"2207.11315","title":"Tradeoffs in Preventing Manipulation in Paper Bidding for Reviewer Assignment","created":"2022-07-22","cited_by_count":4,"area":null},{"id":"2510.02143","title":"How to Find Fantastic AI Papers: Self-Rankings as a Powerful Predictor of Scientific Impact Beyond Peer Review","created":"2025-10-02","cited_by_count":4,"area":null},{"id":"2302.08450","title":"Assisting Human Decisions in Document Matching","created":"2023-02-16","cited_by_count":3,"area":null},{"id":"2309.05457","title":"Unveiling the Sentinels: Assessing AI Performance in Cybersecurity Peer Review","created":"2023-09-11","cited_by_count":3,"area":null},{"id":"2107.10121","title":"Peer Selection with Noisy Assessments","created":"2021-07-21","cited_by_count":2,"area":null},{"id":"2109.00923","title":"Auctions and Peer Prediction for Academic Peer Review","created":"2021-08-27","cited_by_count":2,"area":null},{"id":"2310.18685","title":"When Reviewers Lock Horn: Finding Disagreement in Scientific Peer Reviews","created":"2023-10-28","cited_by_count":2,"area":null},{"id":"2604.04074","title":"FactReview: Evidence-Grounded Peer Review with Execution-Based Claim Verification","created":"2026-04-05","cited_by_count":2,"area":null},{"id":"2201.02539","title":"A Unified Statistical Learning Model for Rankings and Scores with Application to Grant Panel Review","created":"2022-01-07","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2603.00003","title":"Commitment Checklist: Auditing Author Commitments in Peer Review","created":"2026-01-08","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2604.02600","title":"LitPivot: Developing Well-Situated Research Ideas Through Dynamic Contextualization and Critique within the Literature Landscape","created":"2026-04-03","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2609.20481","title":"greCAPTCHA: Assessing Understanding as Evidence of Research Authorship Under Generative AI","created":"2026-09-17","cited_by_count":1,"area":null},{"id":"2205.01607","title":"Modeling and Correcting Bias in Sequential Evaluation","created":"2022-05-03","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2209.08665","title":"Allocation Schemes in Analytic Evaluation: Applicant-Centric Holistic or Attribute-Centric Segmented?","created":"2022-09-18","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2211.02144","title":"No Agreement Without Loss: Learning and Social Choice in Peer Review","created":"2022-11-03","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2211.08419","title":"Participation Interfaces for Human-Centered AI","created":"2022-11-15","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2501.13014","title":"Paper Quality Assessment based on Individual Wisdom Metrics from Open Peer Review","created":"2025-01-22","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2512.17950","title":"Which Coauthor Should I Nominate in My 99 ICLR Submissions? A Mathematical Analysis of the ICLR 2026 Reciprocal Reviewer Nomination Policy","created":"2025-12-17","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2602.06078","title":"Allocate Marginal Reviews to Borderline Papers Using LLM Comparative Ranking","created":"2026-02-04","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2603.19244","title":"The IJCNN 2025 Review Process","created":"2026-02-19","cited_by_count":0,"area":null},{"id":"2605.10171","title":"When Reviews Disagree: Fine-Grained Contradiction Analysis in Scientific Peer Reviews","created":"2026-05-11","cited_by_count":0,"area":null}],"next_cursor":null}